The Amazing Spider-Man, we all know the story, nerd-loner Peter Parker gets bitten by a radio-active spider, he gains super powers and his Uncle Ben dies in the process. He learns some life lessons and is the better for it. But this film does add something different.
The good; I like the swinging scenes, I didn’t think I was going to like the video game like FPS POV angle, but it worked, and it wasn’t over used. They got a lot of those classic Spider-Man poses in, always love when the film imitates the comic. The fight scenes with the Lizard are very well done, I love the use of the web-shooters and how they’re choreographed in to the fighting.
Andrew Garfield doesn’t do a bad job, he’s like-able enough and believable enough as the nerd high-schooler. Denis Leary is great as George Stacey, I’ll probably enjoy everything he does anyway.
Without spoiling too much, we get Peter’s parents’ backstory, which is a nice touch. But that plot line, along with the murderer of Uncle Ben go unresolved by the end of the movie. Yet, it didn’t bother me at all when the credits roll… strange.
There’s a rather cheesy scene as we approach the climax of the third act that involves Spider-Man being helped by the “common working-class man,” but it works.
The bad; a lot of CG usage. I miss having a stunt man that has the physical prowess to perform what’s needed of the character. I miss practical effects, while it takes limitations off of the filmmakers we also lose a sense of, “wow, how’d they do that?” I remember watching this;
Sure it’s dated, but it’s a guy actually climbing up a building and swinging and doing stuff.
We don’t get any resolution with Uncle Ben’s murderer, Peter goes out in search of this thug and doesn’t find him like he did in the previous franchise. We also never find out the whole truth of what happened to his parents… I know I put this in the good section, but why were we given these plot threads to begin with? If they’re going to reboot the franchise and start over with another origin story, why not give us this “new” part of the origin? Why does everything have to be a trilogy these days?
The scene where the Lizard emerges from the sewers and on to New York’s streets with his bag of “goodies” is so the Sony lot, hahaha, but that wouldn’t bug anyone else but THIS GUY.
I’m also not completely sold on the new suit…
Overall, I actually did enjoy this movie. It wasn’t the best, but considering that first trailer left such a bad taste in my mouth, my expectations were low, then it turns out that it isn’t the worst of the worst, so I was able to enjoy this. They mentioned Norman Osborn without showing him, which is only set up for the next movie. Dangling plotlines were unresolved, but masked well so that I didn’t care while watching the movie. I wish they would’ve had more of the Jekyll/Hyde thing going on with the Lizard. Andrew Garfield and Marc Webb do nicely, AND we got a movie where The Daily Bugle wasn’t a set with J. Jonah Jameson, I’m impressed with what they were able to do.
*SPOILER* or speculation… there is a scene during the credits, which isn’t in the sequel, so stay and read the names of all the people that worked so hard to bring you this film, cause you should… know how to read that is, hahaha.
But Doc Connors is placed in prison, he then sees and talks to a mysterious man… who is this person? We never see his face. Is he the voice that’s talking to Connors in his sewer lab?